That being a lot more than my two cents, I will stop.
#ACDSEE FORUM FREE#
It is very fast, and I love the hassle free way it prints.
It handles a wide variety of file formats. I think ACDSee will be a better organizer for multimedia projects. I own both and just can't decide which I Love/Hate the most. All over the world we are having issues with AcdSee and Norton, there are so many forums on both platforms discussing it but the in both camps remain silent.
#ACDSEE FORUM FOR MAC#
I think IView may be as good in some areas, almost as good in most areas, is faster, and supports Mac as well as PC (IDI is PC only), but for an extra $100+ I can deal with a little less speed in exchange for overall better features and a better implementation-and I do not need a cross-platform solution. Forum: Replies: Last Post: ACDSee Photo Studio for Mac 5-35-that’s 65 off until September 18: bladerunner6: Pentax Price Watch: 5: 09-19-2019 01:10 PM: ACDSee Pro 3 RAW conversion: Qiki: Digital Processing, Software, and Printing: 5: 01-09-2011 03:14 PM: ACDsee Editor de fotografas - descargar ACDsee: alitala: Post-Processing Articles: 2. I have a love/hate with both ACDSee and Lightroom. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. before you can post: click the sign up link above to proceed. If this is your first visit, please register to start connecting with the ACD Community. And he implements changes in the program faster and more elegantly than most of us can describe them in plain English-and I type pretty fast!Īnyway, I don't mean to gush, and I have no financial or other interest in IDImager, but I really think it is head and shoulders above the rest, and getting better almost daily. Forum Product Specific Forums ACDSee Ultimate Welcome ACD User. He spends lots of time in the support forums every day listening to people and either answering their questions or working with them to make IDImager better. making the possibility of going to or from another program undaunting.Īlso, as Jeff mentioned above, the developer, Hert, is unbelieavable. And it is the three-tier structure that gives it the leg up over the competition in all of the other areas of importance such as the forward/backward compatibility with other programs, IPTC/XMP, etc. It has gotten faster with each new release (there have been three releases since I started looking at in January!) and is fast enough even now.
IDImager has all of these in spades, with the possible exception of speed-because it uses a three-tier structure (I am no programmer, but my understanding is that there is a layer between the database and the GUI), it is not as fast as IMatch. To me, the most important things are (sort of in order) total forward and backward compatability, ease of use, breadth and depth of features, frequency of udpates/bug fixes/enhancements, speed, and price. I just pulled the trigger on IDImager about a week and a half ago (after completing the 21 day trial) and I am very happy I did. But ACDSee/Mac users might want to contact ACDSee systems.I seriously considered IView, ACDSee (well, I didn't consider ACDSee for long after I looked into it), IMatch, and IDImager very recently. I don't know when, or even if the Mac version will get these upgrades.
#ACDSEE FORUM UPGRADE#
It looks like most existing ACDSee users need to start budgeting for this upgrade to me.
It was released a couple of days ago to almost no fanfare, but I think this is shaping up to a significant upgrade.
0 kommentar(er)
